Flic Home

    Community

    • Login
    • Search
    • Popular
    • Users

    Flic Twist easier selector mode

    User Stories
    3
    3
    665
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rob.loosx
      rob.loosx last edited by

      I think an easier "selector" mode on the Flic Twist would be useful.

      My idea is that the rotation action (without pushing the button) could be the selector: the light would indicate which angle has been selected, and the angle where the rotation is stopped would indicate which action you want to execute.
      E.g. rotating right one step: action one; rotating right two steps: action two; ... rotating left would just go through the actions in reverse order.

      In combination with push+twist (for volume control), this would enable a lot of easy interactions with my home entertainment system (rotate right one step: next song; rotate left one step; previous song; rotate right two steps: source one; rotate right three steps: source two; other actions could be the selection of lighting scenes, ...)

      Ideally these actions would also be available in the SDK.

      admin-flic mx5_94 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • mx5_94
        mx5_94 @rob.loosx last edited by

        @rob-loosx @admin-flic Funny, before I bought the Flic Twist my expectations for how the selector was going to work was similar to how you describe it. My thought was that you turned the selector to a position and that then identified which virtual button you were using. All actions (push, double push, push/twist, hold, etc...) would continue to apply to the virtual button that you'd selected until you changed the selector to a different virtual button. In essence, you would have 12 buttons in one that didn't always reset to the main button after every use. So a little different from how you describe it. And a little different from how it works now where the selection is only temporary. Granted, if you wanted to know which selector was active you might burn battery life with a light on. Maybe you add a motion sensor so the selected button light comes on when you're in front of it. But again, more battery. Just thinking out loud.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • admin-flic
          admin-flic @rob.loosx last edited by

          @rob-loosx This is an excellent idea, much more intuitive than "push and twist".

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post